Using AI text without personalization is a big mistake that many people make. There are many AI detector tools that can spot AI text instantly. And getting your content flagged as AI-written is frustrating. It can put your working reputation at risk.
To avoid AI detection, many people now use AI humanizer tools. These tools humanize the AI-flagged text and remove AI detection. Among popular AI humanizer tools, one is SuperHumanizer, which perfectly converts AI text into human writing and is fully free to use. Still, the tool is very underrated.
In this article, we are going to compare SuperHumanizer with two other free AI humanizers in the market. Let’s see whether SuperHumanizer stands out or it’s just the talk of the town.
Why People Use AI Humanizer Tools?
AI tools help people write quickly. However, AI text often follows patterns. Because of this, AI detectors can identify it. Many people want their text to sound more natural. They want it to look like a real person wrote it.
This is where AI humanizers help.
People use these tools for many reasons. For example, they use it to:
- Make AI text sound natural
- Remove AI detection
- Improve readability
- Make writing feel more human
But the big question remains. Do they really remove AI detection?
Tools We Are Going to Test in This Comparison
We are going to test three different humanizer tools. Each tool will receive the same AI text.
1. SuperHumanizer
SuperHumanizer is an AI text humanizer. It rewrites AI content so it sounds more natural. The tool focuses on changing sentence structure and wording. Its goal is to make the text look human-written.
2. Editpad AI Humanizer
Editpad also offers an AI humanizer tool. This tool rewrites AI text and tries to make it look less robotic. Will see in the coming section whether it really does the required job or not.
3. HumanizeAI
HumanizeAI is another online humanizer. It claims to turn AI text into human-sounding content. The tool changes words and sentence patterns.
The Test Process
To test the efficiency of these AI humanizers, we are going to follow a simple process. We are going to provide the text below, flagged by an AI generated by ZeroGPT.
We are going to humanize the same text in the above image to each humanizer, humanize it. Each tool will generate a new humanized version of the same text.
Lastly, we are going to check every result again using ZeroGPT. This will help you see if the humanizer really worked.
Results After Humanizing with SuperHumanizer
We are going to paste the AI text into the tool and generate the humanized version.
The tool rewrote the content. It changed sentence flow and wording. The text felt more natural. It looked closer to human writing.
Now we are going to check the result for the text humanized by SuperHumanizer with ZeroGPT.
As you can see, for the text humanized by SuperHumanizer, the AI detector showed 100% human written.
This means the AI detection was completely removed in this test.
Results After Using Editpad AI Humanizer
Next, we are going to humanize the same text using AI Humanizer by Editpad.
We placed the same AI text inside the tool. The tool rewrote the content and made some changes.
Some sentences looked different. A few words changed, too.
Now we are going to check the result for this humanization with ZeroGPT.
The detector still flagged the content as AI-written. It means the AI humanizer by Editpad fully failed to remove AI detection.
So in this test, Editpad’s humanizer did not completely solve the problem.
Results For HumanizeAI
Now we are going to test HumanizeAI. Again, we are going to use the same AI text.
The tool produced a new version of the content. Some sentences have changed. The wording also looked a bit different.
Let’s test the output with ZeroGPT.
As you can see, the result still showed AI detection. The tool improved the text slightly, but it did not remove AI detection. So, like Editpad, this tool also failed to pass the AI humanizing test.
Why SuperHumanizer Performed Better?
There may be several reasons why SuperHumanizer worked better.
- It rewrote sentences more deeply. The structure of the text changed more.
- The tool used more natural wording. The sentences flowed better.
- Avoided common AI writing patterns.
Because of this, the detector could not easily flag the content.
Our Take on SuperHumanizer vs Other Humanizers
Based on this test, SuperHumanizer gave the best result. It successfully turned AI text into human-looking content. The final text passed the ZeroGPT detection test.
The other tools made some improvements. However, they still left AI signals in the text.
So if your goal is to reduce AI detection, SuperHumanizer performed better in this comparison. We will recommend you to try it for yourself whenever the need arises to humanize AI text.
